AI implementation
Evaluating AI systems beyond the demo
A useful evaluation does not ask which model wins in isolation. It asks which system performs the work reliably inside its actual operating constraints.
Start with the decision
Define the decision this evaluation must support before selecting metrics. A production evaluation usually decides whether to advance, revise or stop a proposed implementation—not whether one model is universally better than another.
Working ruleEvery measure should change a real implementation decision. If it cannot, it is observation rather than evidence.
Use three evidence planes
01Implemented
Quality, latency, integration behaviour and failure recovery in the intended environment.
02Adopted
Task completion, user trust, correction effort and the usability of fallback paths.
03Governed
Traceability, policy adherence, accountable ownership and the evidence needed for review.
Build the scorecard
Keep thresholds explicit. Compare the system against the existing workflow and the production constraint, not against a demonstration baseline.
| Measure | Threshold | Evidence |
|---|
| Task quality | Meets review rubric | Blind expert review |
| Latency | Within workflow tolerance | p50 / p95 trace |
| Recovery | Known failure path | Scenario test |
Apply the guideRun a representative pilot
Use real task distributions, edge cases and operators before the production decision.
Uploaded research artifact
This source is stored in your browser and is ready for synthesis.
- File
- Stored
Next stepReview the source, preserve its citations, and turn the findings into applied sections before publishing it to the team.